[ home | files | links | topics | stickers | about ]

Todays Stats

Visitors: 171
Referrers: 7
User Agents: 64
Pages Served: 406
Total Pages



Texas is Growing (hands off)
news : by Tommy - December 21st 2009, 11:33PM
So the other night I was thinking about the map of our United States of America. I began to ponder just how states' boundaries are defined. Some states are defined by rivers, lakes and other bodies of water. Some states are defined by man-made boundaries (which can lead to some interesting disputes).

Currently, Texas' western boundaries are defined in the Compromise of 1850 as "that which is south of the 33rd parallel, and that which is south of the 36°30' parallel north and east of the 103rd meridian west." The eastern edge of the panhandle lies along the 100th meridian west. To the south, Texas has the natural boundaries: the Rio Grande and the Gulf of Mexico (src: Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo). Along the north, a natural border to Oklahoma exists along the Red River. To the East we have the Sabine River from the Gulf up to the 32nd parallel, then straight north to the Red River (Adams-Onís Treaty). Interesting, but so what? Plate Tectonics.

In the early 20th century, geologists developed a theory that described continental drift. They dubbed it Plate Tectonics. It has been discovered that continents do move, so naturally so does everything on them. Texas, and the vast majority of the United States "lower 48" (plus Alaska) ride on the North American plate. The North American Plate moves at about 1.5cm/yr more or less toward the Southeast. This means that Texas is slowly taking land away from New Mexico while losing land to Oklahoma and Louisiana. Texas will not lose land to Mexico, thanks to the natural boundary, the Rio Grande (which rides on the plate). Astronomical longitude/latitude lines do not move (they are based on the proximity to the poles and prime meridian (which is physically drifting too, but now there exist astronomical definitions to account for this) Because of this, the land that moves under the aforementioned longitude/latitude boundaries become, in essence, Texas.

Because of these findings, I hereby proclaim that at the time of this writing, I become sole owner of unclaimed lands that move into the boundaries of Texas. Hands off.

update: By my rough calculations, in 69,971 years I'll own all of present-day Texico, NM; and in 1,399,429 years I'll own present-day Clovis, NM. (I will cede Cannon AFB to the federal government.)

update #2: I also claim ownership of all lands that have entered the Texas boundaries dating back to the formation of said boundaries (1850). That should give me a strip of land about 6 ft of land about 241 miles long (assuming 1° is about 69mi) plus whatever land runs along the line from El Paso to the Pecos region.
2009-1850=159yrs, 159yr*1.15cm/yr=182.85cm ≈ 6ft

tags: plate tectonics texas

+ Corey T.
  Dec 22, 2009 16:25
I would like to be the Viceroy of Seasoned Meat and thus request that all travel through this territory be on unicycles.


-+- neodux blog -+-
Page generated for in 0.01942 seconds.
rss 2.0 feed